Communicative cultural practices of development of memorative landscape (based on the example of Arkaim)

Authors

  • Denis Kiselev Chelyabinsk State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47475/2070-0695-2023-50-4-85-88

Keywords:

memorial landscape, identity, Arkaim, cultural memory, rituals, practices

Abstract

The article examines various manifestations of identity types that materialize in the memorial landscape using the example of Arkaim, an archaeological site in the Chelyabinsk region. The theoretical basis of the study was the “theory of social identity”. Based on intensive observations and seven interviews with visitors to Arkaim, a conclusion is drawn about through which objects identity is reflected in the memorial landscape. They become, for example, the tops of hills and stone slabs. The rituals performed by visitors to Arkaim are usually associated with religion or have their origin in historically established folk traditions. Moreover, such rituals are traditional for those peoples whose many generations live in the Urals (where the archaeological monument Arkaim itself is located). The result of the study is the conclusion that in Arkaim people most often do not strive to find new practices and rituals, but to repeat those already familiar to them. The goal of such visitors is, first of all, to achieve the fulfillment of some desire. Researchers believe that the motivation to turn to the natural landscape for their implementation is the search for and acquisition of one’s own identity. This can be achieved precisely by conducting ceremonies and rituals on the landscape objects of the Arkaim monument.

Acknowledgments: The study was Supported by the Russian Science Foundation and Chelyabinsk region, No 23-18-20098, https://rscf.ru/en/project/23-18-20098/

Author Biography

Denis Kiselev, Chelyabinsk State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia

student of the Faculty of Journalism at Chelyabinsk State University

References

Blagorodova, E. A. (2020). Kulturnaya pamyat’: politika identichnosti i formirovanie identichnosti zhertvy [Cultural memory: identity politics and the formation of victim identity]. Kul’tura i civilizatsiya, 2 (2), 125–132. (in Russ.).

Baryshnikov, A. B. & Koshel’nik, E. I. (2014). Mesta sily [Places of power]. Novye issledovaniya v razrabotke tekhniki i tekhnologiy, 2, 46–51. (in Russ.).

Vandyshev, M. N., Veselkova, N. V. & Pryamikova, E. V. (2022). Memorativniy landshaft: kontseptsiya i opyt primeneniya [Memorial landscape: concept and application experience]. Sotsiologiya vlasti, 1, 69–90. (in Russ.).

Veselkova, N. V. (2022). Memorativniy landshaft: opyt metodologicheskoy refleksii [Memorative landscape: experience of methodological reflection]. Memorativnie landshafty malykh gorodov Rossii i Pol’shi. Ekaterinburg: Izdatel’stvo Ural’skogo universiteta, 50–61. (in Russ.).

Zagidullina, M. V. (2023). K probleme metodov issledovaniya memorativnykh landshaftov kak mest konstruirovaniya kul’turno- istoricheskoy pamyati [On the problem of research methods for memorial landscapes as places for constructing cultural and historical memory]. Medialingvistika, Sankt-Peterburg, 510–514. (in Russ.).

Zagidullina, M. V. (2018). Posttravmaticheskaya refleksiya i social’naya samoterapiya: otvet na vyzov ritoriki “dukhovnogo krizisa” (labirint Shartra i spiral’Arkaima) [Post-traumatic reflection and social self-therapy: a response to the challenge of the rhetoric of “spiritual crisis” (the labyrinth of Chartres and the spiral of Arkaim)]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 1 (149), 318–332. (in Russ.).

Lents, G. T. (2008). K voprosu o svytilishchakh s kamnyami [On the issue of sanctuaries with stones]. Trudy Kamskoy arkheologo- etnogrficheskoy ekspeditsii, 5, 173–178. (in Russ.).

Pimenova, O. I. (2009). Sootnoshenie ponyatiy “social’naya identichnost’” i “social’naya identifikaciya” [The relationship between the concepts of “social identity” and “social identification”]. Kul’tura, lichnost’, obshchestvo v sovremennom mire: metodologiya, opyt empiricheskogo issledovaniya, 1, 90–92. (in Russ.).

Silina, V. E. (2011). Sovremennye relgioznye dvizheniya na territory zapovednika “Arkaim”: osobennosti organizatsii i deyatel’nosti [Modern religious movements on the territory of the Arkaim nature reserve: features of organization and activities]. Chelyabinsk. (in Russ.).

Ugaev, M. A. (2004). Virtual’niy mir neoyazychnikov [Virtual world of neo-pagans]. Stepi i lesostepi Zaurl’ya: materialy k issledovaniyam. Chelyabinsk, Krokus, 176–187.(in Russ.).

Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (2004). The Social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Political psychology: Key readings. 276–293.

Published

2023-12-21

How to Cite

Kiselev, D. (2023). Communicative cultural practices of development of memorative landscape (based on the example of Arkaim). Znak: Problemnoe Pole Mediaobrazovanija, (4 (50), 85–88. https://doi.org/10.47475/2070-0695-2023-50-4-85-88

Issue

Section

Materialized identity: constructing memory in a socio-economic perspective (using the example of the archaeological site Arkaim)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.