System of images of the memorative landscape of the archaeological monument Arkaim as a factor of its popularization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47475/2070-0695-2023-50-4-102-111Keywords:
memorial landscape, image, system of images, Arkaim, archaeological site, place of memory, cultural landscapeAbstract
Having formulated the purpose of the study as studying the specifics of the system of images of the memorial landscape of the archaeological site Arkaim as a factor in its popularization, the authors of the article consistently move towards its implementation. The research, the results of which are presented in the article, has theoretical significance: it convincingly shows that the memorial landscape can be considered as a self-sufficient media text; the quality of the memorial landscape is highlighted as a media text with pronounced literary features; It is noted that one of the key factors in the literariness of a media text is the system of images. The practical significance of the study lies in the fact that, based on the analysis of in-depth interviews with actors of the memorial landscape, a system of images of the memorial landscape of the archaeological site Arkaim was formed as a factor in its popularization. The main research methods were in-depth interviews with actors in the memorial landscape of Arkaim, their analysis and scientific interpretation of the content; Clifford Geertz's saturated description method. The basis for the study was the elements of the memorial landscape of the archaeological site Arkaim as interpreted by 23 actors (staff and guests of the archaeological site).
The authors of the article consider the memorial landscape of the archaeological site Arkaim as a media-aesthetic phenomenon with pronounced elements of literature, which can be viewed through the system of images that has developed in its location.
Summing up the results of the work, the authors of the study identified the elements of the system of images of the memorial landscape of the archaeological site Arkaim and formulated ideas about the images of the past. The identified specificity of the memorial landscape of the archaeological site Arkaim creates objective difficulties in the process of its public presentation on traditional and new media platforms.
Acknowledgments: The study was Supported by the Russian Science Foundation and Chelyabinsk region, No 23-18-20098, https://rscf.ru/en/project/23-18-20098.
References
Antropova, V. V. (2022). Kontseptosfera «dukhovnost’» v zhurnalistskom diskurse: eksplikatsiya tsennostey [Conceptosphere of “spirituality” in journalistic discourse: explication of values]. Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinsk State University. 195 p. https://doi.org/10.47475/9785727118504. (In Russ.)
Assman, Y. (2004). Kul’turnaya pamyat’: Pis’ma, pamyat’ o proshlom i politicheskaya identichnost’ v vysokikh kul’turakh drevnosti / Per. s nem. M. M. Sokol’skoy [Cultural memory: Letters, memory of the past and political identity in high cultures of antiquity / Transl. with him. M. M. Sokolskaya]. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Culture. 368 p. (In Russ.)
Bart, R. (1989). Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika. Poetika: Per. s fr. / R. Bart ; Sost., obshch. red. i vstup. st. G. K. Kosikova [Selected works: Semiotics. Poetics: Trans. from fr. / R. Bart; Comp., total. ed. and entry Art. G.K. Kosikova]. Moscow: Progress. 616 p. (In Russ.)
Baudrillard, J. (2009). Simvolicheskiy obmen i smert’ [Symbolic exchange and death]. Moscow: KDU. 389 p. (In Russ.)
Vandyshev, M. N., Veselkova, N. V. & Pryamikova, E. V. (2022). Memorativnyy landshaft: kontseptsiya i opyt primeneniya [Memorative landscape: concept and experience of application]. Sotsiologiya vlasti, T. 34, 1, 69–94. (In Russ.)
Veselkova, N. V. (2022). Memorativnyy landshaft: opyt metodologicheskoy refleksii [Memorative landscape: experience of methodological reflection]. Memorativnye landshafty malykh gorodov Rossii i Pol’shi : Sbornik nauchnykh trudov / Ural’skiy federal’nyy universitet imeni pervogo Prezidenta Rossii B. N. El’tsina; Estestvenno-gumanitarnyy universitet (g. Sedl’tse, Pol’sha). Ekaterinburg: Ural University Publishing House, 50–61. (In Russ.)
Veselkova, N. V. & Pryamikova, E. V. (2022). Memorativnyy landshaft malogo goroda: konfiguratsii i sloi [Memorative landscape of a small town: configurations and layers]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, 6, 196–212. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869541522060112. (In Russ.)
Zagidullina, M. V. (2023). K probleme metodov issledovaniya memorativnykh landshaftov kak mest konstruirovaniya kul’turno-istoricheskoy pamyati [On the problem of methods for studying memorial landscapes as places for constructing cultural and historical memory]. Medialingvistika : Materialy dokladov uchastnikov VII Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii, Sankt-Peterburg, 28 iyunya – 01 iyulya 2023 goda. St. Petersburg: Mediapapir LLC, 510–514. (In Russ.)
Zagidullina, M. V. (2019). Panmediatizatsiya: zakat verbal’noy kommunikatsii: monografiya [Panmediatization: the decline of verbal communication: monograph]. Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinsk State University Publishing House. 225 p. (In Russ.)
Zubanova, L. B. (2023). Memorial’naya identichnost’: mezhdu mestom pamyati i pamyat’yu mest [Memorial identity: between the place of memory and the memory of places]. Chelyabinskij gumanitarij, 1 (62), 32–38. (In Russ.)
Konkov, V. I. (2020). Izobrazhenie i obraz v mediynoy srede [Image and image in the media environment]. Mediasreda, 17, 37–41. (In Russ.)
Ladygina, T. A. (2023). Rol’ memorativnykh landshaftovv formirovanii kul’turnoy pamyati o zashchitnikakh Otechestva [The role of memorial landscapes in the formation of cultural memory of the defenders of the Fatherland]. Chelyabinskij gumanitarij, 1 (62), 39–45. (In Russ.)
Leonov, I. V. & Kirillov, I. V. (2021). «Prizrachnye derevni» v kul›turnoy pamyati Rossii [“Ghost villages” in the cultural memory of Russia]. Chelovek. Kul’tura. Obrazovanie, 4 (42), 90–108. (In Russ.)
Losev, A. F. (1992). Istoriya antichnoy estetiki. Itogi tysyacheletnego razvitiya: V 2 kn. [History of ancient aesthetics. Results of a thousand years of development: In 2 books]. Moscow: Art. Book. 1. 834 p. (In Russ.)
McLuhan, M. (2022). Galaktika Gutenberga. Stanovlenie cheloveka chitayushchego [The Gutenberg Galaxy. The formation of a reading person / Transl. Tyurina I. O]. Moscow: Academic project. 443 p. (In Russ.)
Sadym, V. A. & Sadym, K. B. (2021). Istoriko-kul’turnoe nasledie kosmonavtiki na Kubani: «mesta pamyati» i kommemorativnye praktiki [Historical and cultural heritage of astronautics in Kuban: “places of memory” and commemorative practices]. Nasledie vekov, 2, 35–53. https://doi.org/10.36343./SB.2021.26.2.003. (In Russ.)
Simakova, S. I. (2021). Obraz Arkaima v SMI [The image of Arkaim in the media]. Znak: problemnoe pole mediaobrazovanija, 4 (42), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.47475/2070-0695-2021-10418. (In Russ.)
Halbwachs, M. (2005). Kollektivnaya i istoricheskaya pamyat’ [Collective and historical memory]. Pamyat’ o voyne 60 let spustya: Rossiya, Germaniya, Evropa. Moscow: New Literary Review, 16–50. (In Russ.)
Shestakova, E. G. (2016). Mediaslovo i mediatekst: vzglyad s teorritorii literaturovedeniya [Media words and media text: a view from the theory of literary criticism]. Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki, 14 (235). Issue 30, 109–114. (In Russ.)
Jung, K. G. (2019). Arkhetipy i kollektivnoe bessoznatel’noe / Per. Chechino A. A. [Archetypes and the collective unconscious / Transl. Chechino A. A.]. Moscow: AST. 552 p. (In Russ.)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Andrey Safonov, Irina Topchii
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
