Materialized identity as a result of communicative practices (the case of Arkaim)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47475/2070-0695-2025-57-3-149-157Keywords:
Arkaim, forms of tourist activity, materialized identity, information deprivation, communication practice, communication theory of identity (CTI)Abstract
This article presents statistical data derived from surveys conducted in 2024 among visitors to the Chelyabinsk State Historical and Archaeological Museum-Reserve "Arkaim" (N=483) and examines the process of the formation of materialized identity among visitors to the memorial landscape. Special attention is given to the communicative practices through which tourists engage with the spatial environment, cultural objects, and each other, constructing both individual and group forms of self-identification and collective belonging. The study also explores the interplay between the informational field and the representation of Arkaim as a “place of power,” including the issue of information deprivation. The article is structured around four thematic blocks of questions asked to respondents in varying order to maintain the natural flow of conversation: a general information block covering socio-demographic characteristics; a motivational block aimed at uncovering reasons for visiting Arkaim; an informational-epistemological block investigating sources of information about Arkaim and tourist attitudes toward its two primary interpretations—scientific and spiritual-esoteric; and a praxeological-identification block focused on practices of site engagement aligned with respondents’ epistemological identities. Drawing on comprehensive survey data, key motivations are identified, including spiritual seeking, exploration of historical heritage, and social production of shared meanings via rituals and collective actions. Materialized identity manifests in embodied practices, landscape perception, and symbolic use of objects. The article demonstrates that the appropriation of Arkaim is a dynamic process wherein the personal and collective continuously intertwine, creating a durable symbolic connection with the space. It also posits that information deprivation is sustained by visitors themselves as a condition for preserving the site’s aura.
Acknowledgments: The study was Supported by the Russian Science Foundation and Chelyabinsk region, № 23-18-20098, https://rscf.ru/en/project/23-18-20098/
References
Zagidullina, M. V. (2024). Osvoenie memorativnogo landshafta kak kommunikativnaya praktika (na primere istoriko-arkheologicheskogo muzeya «Arkaim») [Memorial landscape appropriation as a communicative practice (on the example of the historical-archaeological museum “Arkaim”)]. Znak: problemnoe pole mediaobrazovanija, 1 (51). 88–96. https://doi.org/10.47475/2070-0695-2024-51-1-88-96. (In Russ).
Zubanova, L. B., Zykhovskaya, N. L., Shub, M. L. (2024). Arkhaicheskiy pamiatnik Arkaim: praktiki osvoeniya i sub"ektivnye smysly vospriyatiya memorial'nykh landshaftov [The archaic monument Arkaim: practices of appropriation and subjective meanings of perception of memorial landscapes]. Diskurs-Pi, 21 (2). 90–110. https://doi.org/10.17506/1817-9568_2024_21_2_90. (In Russ).
Kiselev, D. G. (2025). Formirovanie obraza arkheologicheskogo pamiatnika na regional'nom televidenii (na primere Arkaima) [Formation of the image of an archaeological monument on regional television (using the example of Arkaim)]. Znak: problemnoe pole mediaobrazovanija, 1 (55). 120–124. https://doi.org/10.47475/2070-0695-2025-55-1-120-124. (In Russ).
Medvedeva, A. R. (2025). Strukturnoe vospriyatie prostranstva: v poiskakh affekta (na materiale oprosov posetiteley Arkaima) [Structural perception of space: in search of affect (based on surveys of Arkaim visitors)]. Znak: problemnoe pole mediaobrazovanija, 1 (55). 125–132. DOI https://doi.org/10.47475/2070-0695-2025-55-1-125-132. (In Russ).
Myagkov, A. Yu. (2023). Sensitivnye issledovaniya: opyt retrospektivnogo analiza i kontseptualizatsii [Sensitive studies: experience of retrospective analysis and conceptualization]. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal, 3. 8–28. (In Russ).
Safonov, A. V., Topchii, I. V. (2024). Apellyatsiya k identichnosti kak strategiya popularizatsii istorii [Appeal to identity as a strategy for popularizing history]. Magistra Vitae: elektronnyy zhurnal po istoricheskim naukam i arkheologii, 9 (3). 83–90. https://doi.org/10.47475/2542-0275-2024-9-3-83-90. (In Russ).
Ababneh, A. (2021). Archaeological sites’ management, interpretation, and tourism development – a success story and future challenges: the case of Bibracte, France. Heritage, 4. 2261–2277. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4030128.
Craig, R. T. (2005). Communication as practice. Communication as ...: Perspectives on Theory, Gregory J. Shepherd, Jeffrey St. John, Ted Striphas (eds). SAGE Publications, 38–49.
Gardiner, S., Vada, S., Yang, E. C. L., Khoo, C., Le, T. H. (2022). Recreating history: the evolving negotiation of staged authenticity in tourism experiences. Tourism Management, 91. Article 104515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104515.
Hecht, M. L. (1993). 2002 – A research odyssey: toward the development of a communication theory of identity. Communication Monographs, 60. 76–82.
McCabe, S., Stokoe, E. H. (2004). Place and identity in tourists’ accounts. Annals of Tourism Research, 31 (3). 601–622.
Rickly, J., Sharma, N., Canavan, B. (2023). Authenticity: the state-of-the-art in tourism geographies. Tourism Geographies, 27 (3–4). 528–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2023.2290017.
Tiberghien, G., Mukhamedjanova, R., Xie, P. F. (2023). Authenticity and spectrality of space heritage: Baikonur Cosmodrome, Kazakhstan. Tourism Geographies, 25 (5). 1445–1464. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2023.2231422.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. New York, Cambridge University Press, 318 p.
Yee, A. K. (2023). Information deprivation and democratic engagement. Philosophy of Science, 90 (5). 1110–1119. https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2023.9.
Schiller, H. I. (2018). Information deprivation in an information-rich society. Invisible Crises (pp. 15–26). Routledge.
Yi, X., Fu, X., Lin, B., Sun, J. (2024). Authenticity, identity, self-improvement, and responsibility at heritage sites: the local residents’ perspective. Tourism Management, 102. Article 104875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104875.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Марина Загидуллина
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
