Toxic communication vs aggressive communication (based on media texts)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47475/2070-0695-2025-57-3-75-85Keywords:
speech aggression, toxic communication, media speech practices, Internet commentary, network communicationAbstract
The article analyzes scientific papers devoted to the understanding of aggressive communication and toxic communication as linguistic and socio-cultural phenomena of our time; it identifies the technical, technological, and socio-communicative conditions that contributed to the emergence and development of such forms of speech behavior as toxic media communication in the Internet space. Based on the literature analysis, the author will identify common and distinctive features of aggressive communication and toxic communication, which are related but not identical phenomena. Relying on the integrating and differentiating features (indicators) of both forms of speech behavior, the author analyzes specific media texts for the implementation of signs of communicative aggression and toxicity in them. A number of indicators were taken into account: the nature of the development of a communicative conflict, the order of the exchange of remarks, the duration of communication, the nature of the victim's verbal reactions, the communicative effect achieved by the aggressor, and the final communicative intention. The material was Internet comments on a "neutral" art publication "What happens in this painting by William Bouguereau?" (posted on the channel "arts_tobe – just about art" of the blog platform "Yandex.Zen"). Users left 272 comments, and the 25 most popular comments with accompanying comments were selected for analysis. The analysis showed that toxic comments "infect" and "cling" to the addressee due to hyperbolization, dramatization of the details of the overall picture, distortion of information, and slander. The interlocutor shows signs of verbal arousal: he is verbose, proactive and inertial, his speech is confused. The process of toxic media communication often involves both toxic communicants – interlocutors who are ready to maintain and develop this type of interaction, exchanging toxic statements and the roles of aggressor and victim. The conversation develops according to an agonal scenario, as a result of which the verbal contest continues until the aggressor's obvious victory and, consequently, the victim's defeat. The toxic communicator always has the last word, and this fact serves as a formal indicator of his communicative superiority over the defeated interlocutor. All participants of the polylogue become witnesses of the public victory.
References
Antropova, V. V. (2015). Rechevaya agressiya v tekstah social'nyh setej: kommunikativnyj aspekt [Speech aggression in social media texts: a communicative aspect]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 3, 123–127. (In Russ).
Banshchikova, T. N. (2013). Aggressiya kak ponyatiynyy konstrukt: ob"yasnitel'nyye kharakteristiki i vidy [Aggression as a conceptual construct: explanatory characteristics and types]. Kontsept, 8, 71–75. (In Russ).
Buryakovskaya, V. A., Dmitrieva, O. A. (2022). Kvazinauchnyj termin «toksichnyj» v sovremennoj blogosfere (na materiale russkogo, anglijskogo i francuzskogo yazykov) [The quasi-scientific term "toxic" in the modern blogosphere (based on the material of Russian, English and French)]. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 5 (168), 132–139. (In Russ).
Vorontsova, T. A. (2006). Rechevaya agressiya: vtorzheniye v kommunikativnoye prostranstvo [Verbal aggression: intrusion into communicative space]. Izhevsk: Izdatel'skiy dom "Udmurtskiy universitet". 252 p. (In Russ).
Voroncova, T. A. (2006). Rechevaya agressiya: kommunikativno-diskursivnyj podhod [Speech aggression: a communicative and discursive approach] : avtoref. dis. ... d-ra filol. nauk. Chelyabinsk. 43 р. (In Russ).
Voroncova, T. A. (2016). Trolling i flejming: rechevaya agressiya v internet-kommunikacii [Trolling and flaming: speech aggression in Internet communication]. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta, t. 26, 2, 109–116. (In Russ).
Glushchenko, O. A., Grishanin, N. V., Kirillina, N. V. (2021). Ekologiya kommunikacii: faktory toksichnosti v medijnyh tekstah [Ecology of communication: toxicity factors in media text]. Kommunikologiya, t. 9, 4, 160–178. https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2021-9-4-160-178. (In Russ).
Dement'ev, V. V. (2010). Teoriya rechevyh zhanrov [Theory of speech genres]. Moscow: Znak, 600 р. (In Russ).
Dzyaloshinskij, I. M. Mezhdu agressiej i tolerantnost'yu – istoricheskij vybor rossijskih SMI [Between aggression and tolerance – the historical choice of the Russian media]. Iosif Dzyaloshinskij. Chelovek. Kommunikaciya. Obshchestvo. Available at: https://dzyalosh.ru/06-Tolerance/Mejdu-Agressiei-i-Tolerantnostuy.pdf (accessed: 31.01.2025). (In Russ.).
Yermolovich, O. V. & Ivanov, A. E. (2023). Toksichnost’ kak lingvopragmaticheskiy fenomen: osnovnye kharakteristiki i stsenarii kommunikativnogo povedeniya [Toxicity as a linguistic pragmatic phenomenon: main characteristics and scenarios of communicative behavior]. Na perekrestke kul’tur: yedinstvo yazyka, literatury i obrazovaniya. Mogilev: MGU imeni A.A. Kuleshova, 46–49. (In Russ.)
Eromejchik, T. V. (2021). Rechevaya agressiya kak sposob social'nogo vzaimodejstviya v setevoj sportivnoj kommunikacii [Speech aggression as a way of social interaction in online sports communication]. Vestnik Minskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta, 5 (114), 35–42. (In Russ.)
Zav'yalova, O. N. (2011). Rechevaya (yazykovaya, verbal'naya) agressiya [Speech (linguistic, verbal) aggression]. Enciklopedicheskij slovar'-spravochnik. Vyrazitel'nye sredstva russkogo yazyka i rechevye oshibki i nedochety. Moscow: Flinta, 460–463. (In Russ.).
Ionova, S. V. (2018). Toksichnyj rukovoditel': lingvoekologiya rechevogo povedeniya [Toxic supervisor: linguoecology of speech behavior]. Ekologiya yazyka i kommunikativnaya praktika, 4 (15), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.17516/2311-3499-033. (In Russ.).
Issers, O. S. (2008). Kommunikativnye strategii i taktiki russkoj rechi [Communicative strategies and tactics of Russian speech]. Moscow: LKI, 288 р. (In Russ).
Karayani, A. G. (2021). Toksichnoe social'noe povedenie [Toxic social behavior]. Enciklopedicheskij psihologicheskij slovar'-spravochnik. 1000 ponyatij, opredelenij, terminov. Minsk: Harvest, 623–624. (In Russ).
Karyakin, A. V. (2010). Stratagemno-takticheskie sposoby realizacii rechevoj agressii v politicheskom diskurse (na materiale nemeckogo yazyka) [Stratagem-tactical ways of implementing speech aggression in political discourse (based on the material of the German language)] : avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Volgograd. 20 р. (In Russ).
Komalova, L. R. (2015). Yazyk i rechevaya agressiya: analiticheskij obzor [Language and speech aggression: analytical review]. Moscow: Institut nauchnoj informacii po obshchestvennym naukam RAN, 75 р. (In Russ).
Kondrashova, E. V., Ermakova, E. V. (2021). Rechevaya agressiya v publicisticheskoj rechi (na primere tok-shou «60 minut» i «Mesto vstrechi») [Verbal aggression in journalistic speech (on the example of the talk shows "60 Minutes" and "Meeting Place")]. Epoha nauki, 26, 114–118. https://doi.org/10.24412/2409-3203-2021-26-114-118. (In Russ).
Krysin, L. P. (2006). Tolkovyj slovar' inoyazychnyh slov [Explanatory dictionary of foreign words]. Moscow: Eksmo, 944 р. (In Russ).
Labutina, V. V., Topchii, I. V. (2022). Konstruirovanie gendernoy identichnosti v otsenochnoy praktike kommentariya setevogo mediasontenta [Constructing gender identity in the evaluative practice of commenting on online media content]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filologiya. Zhurnalika, 2, 143–148. (In Russ)
Larionova, T. V. (2017). Rechevaya agressiya: ot rechevoj praktiki k sociokognitivnoj matrice [Speech aggression: from speech practice to the sociocognitive matrix]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 7–1 (73), 117–120. (In Russ).
Nikonova, N. V., Petrova, A. S., Rakhidova, D. T. (2022). Rechevaya agressiya: formy i sfery bytovaniya. Kul'turno-natsional'naya spetsifika proyavleniya [Verbal aggression: forms and spheres of existence. Cultural and national specificity of manifestation]. Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 15 (2), 413–418. https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20220089. (In Russ).
Osin, R. V. (2022). Obraz «chuzhogo» v seksual'noy kul'ture Rossii kak otrazheniye gomofobii sredi sovremennoy molodezhi [The image of the "other" in the sexual culture of Russia as a reflection of homophobia among modern youth]. Chelovecheskiy kapital, 11 (167), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.25629/HC.2022.11.16. (In Russ).
Pavlova, O. S. (2021). Psihologiya deprivacii. Slovar' special'nyh terminov i ponyatij [Psychology of deprivation. Dictionary of special terms and concepts]. Orenburg : Orenburgskij gos. ped. universitet, 71 р. (In Russ).
Popova, A. A. (2021). Rechevaya agressiya studencheskoj molodezhi: reprezentativnye funkcii v kontekste stereotipov massovogo kommunikativnogo povedeniya [Speech aggression of student youth: representative functions in the context of stereotypes of mass communicative behavior] : avtoref. dis. ... kand. sociol. nauk. Majkop. 29 р. (In Russ).
Sedov, K. F. (2005). Agressiya i manipulyaciya v povsednevnoj kommunikacii [Aggression and manipulation in everyday communication]. Yurislingvistika, 6, 87–103. (In Russ).
Skovorodnikov, A. P., Kopnina, G. A. (2017). Lingvotoksichnye yavleniya v rechi i yazyke [Linguotoxic phenomena in speech and language]. Mir russkogo slova, 3, 28–32. (In Russ).
Steksova, T. I. (2013). Rechevaya agressiya v internet-kommentariyah kak proyavlenie social'noj napryazhennosti [Speech aggression in Internet comments as a manifestation of social tension]. Politicheskaya lingvistika, 3 (45), 77–81. (In Russ).
Sternin, I. A. (2001). Vvedenie v rechevoe vozdejstvie [Introduction to speech impact]. Moscow: RGB, 252 p. (In Russ).
Sundiev, I. Yu., Smirnov, A. A. (2020). «Toksichnyj» kontent v seti Internet i ego vliyanie na radikalizaciyu molodezhi ["Toxic" content on the Internet and its impact on the radicalization of youth]. Nauchnyj portal MVD Rossii, 4 (52), 35–44. (In Russ).
Filippova, M. P. (2024). Soderzhatel'nye parametry rechevoj agressii v zhanre internet-kommentariya [Meaningful parameters of speech aggression in the genre of Internet commentary] : avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Volgograd. 24 р. (In Russ).
Firsova, M. A. (2018). Kognitivno-diskursivnye parametry yazykovoj agressii v rechi publichnoj yazykovoj lichnosti [Cognitive-discursive parameters of linguistic aggression in the speech of a public linguistic personality] : dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Astrahan'. 236 р. (In Russ).
Hmara, R. Yu. (2021). Rechevye formy agressii: leksiko-semanticheskij i stilisticheskij aspekty (na materiale audiozapisej) [Speech forms of aggression: lexico-semantic and stylistic aspects (based on audio recordings)]. Politicheskaya lingvistika, 4 (88), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.26170/1999-2629_2021_04_12. (In Russ).
Shcherbinina, Yu. V. Verbal'naya agressiya v shkol'noj rechevoj srede [Verbal aggression in the school speech environment] : avtoref. dis. ... kand. ped. nauk. Moscow. 16 р. (In Russ).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Вера Антропова
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
