Sarcastic evaluation in mass media as a tool for discrediting a person: speech representation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47475/2070-0695-2021-10414Keywords:
sarcasm, humour, linguistic praxeology, discrediting, speech representationAbstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of a sarcastic evaluation of a person, which leads to their discrediting in media texts. Sarcastic evaluation is considered in terms of linguistic praxeology: the language and compositional means of nomination, description, and actions are analyzed. In a media text, these means interacting with the means of expressing the category of deviance and forming semantic nodes. The category of deviance can manifest itself, on the one hand, in exuberance or the absurd, and on the other hand, in simplification or insufficiency of the sign revelation. Specific sarcastic speech techniques are based on the discrepancy of referent and illocutionary meanings in the person’s speech portrait. The study of Russian media discourse about Swedish eco-activist Greta Thunberg revealed the active use of linguistic means expressing sarcastic evaluation to demonstrate the opposing viewpoint in relation to the transmitted semantic position of “Other”. When the media represents Greta in the totality of her disadvantages, it enters into a polemic against those who support the ideas of this person. Linguistic means of sarcastic evaluation are widely represented in discrediting media texts. The most important of them are means such as absurdity, hyperbole, alogism, simplification, etc.
Acknowledgments: The research was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Science Foundation in the framework of the scientific project No. 19-18-00530.
References
Apresyan, J. D. (1995). Obraz cheloveka po dannym yazyka: Popytka sistemnogo opisaniya [Image of a person according to the language: An attempt to describe the system]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya [Linguistics Issues] 1, pp. 37-67. (in Russ.).
Belinskiy, V. G. (1956). Polnoye sobraniye sochineniy. Tom desyatiy [Full composition of writings. Volume Ten]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Akademii nauk SSSR, 476 p. (In Russ.)
Borev, Yu. B. (1970). Komicheskoye, ili O tom. kak smekh kaznit nesovershenstvo mira. ochishchayet i obnovlyayet cheloveka i utverzhdayet radost bytiya [The comic, or About how laughter punishes the imperfection of the world, cleanses and renews person and affirms the joy of being]. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 270 p. (in Russ.).
Bykova, E. V. (2020). Greta Tunberg kak mediatizirovannyj fenomen [Greta Thunberg as a precedent media phenomenon]. Medialingvistika. Materialy IV mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii [Media Linguistics. Materials of the IV international scientific conference], pp. 27–31. (in Russ.).
Vavilova, T. V. (2010). O ponyatii sarkazma [About the concept of sarcasm]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Moscow State Linguistic University] 596 (17), pp. 147–155. (in Russ.).
Lomonosov, M. V. (1952). Polnoye sobraniye sochineniy. Tom sedmoy. Trudy po filologii (1739–1758) [Full composition of writings. Volume Seven. Proceedings in Philology (1739–1758)]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Akademii nauk SSSR, 970 p. (in Russ.).
Mann, Yu. V. (1971). Sarcasm, in Surkov, A. (ed.), Kratkaya literaturnaya entsiklopediya [Brief Encyclopedia of Literature]. Moscow: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, pp. 659–660. (in Russ.).
Mishlanov, V. A. & Netsvetaeva, N. S. (2009). Kommunikativnye strategii i taktiki v sovremennom politicheskom diskurse (na materiale politicheskoy reklamy predvybornykh kampaniy 2003. 2007. 2008 gg.) [Communicative strategies and tactics in modern political discourse (basing on the political advertisments of the election campaigns of 2003, 2007, 2008)’. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta [Perm University Bulletin]. 6, pp. 5-13. (in Russ.).
Mukhina, Yu. N. (2006). Sredstva reprezentatsii ironii v khudozhestvennom tekste [Means of Representing Irony in a Literary Text]. PhD thesis, Saratov, 175 p. (in Russ.).
Orlova, G. V. (2005). Sredstva formirovaniya ironicheskoj modal'nosti v sovremennom publicisticheskom diskurse [Means of forming an ironic modality in modern publicistic discourse]. PhD thesis, Saint Petersburg, 176 p. (in Russ.).
Semedov, S. A. & Sukhareva, V. A. (2020). Fenomen Grety Tunberg ili tekhnologii mediatizacii protesta [The Greta Thunberg’s Phenomenon and Technology of Mediatization of Ecological Protests]. Koncept: filosofiya, religiya, kul'tura [Concept: Philosophy, Religion, Culture] 1 (13), pp. 121–138. (in Russ.).
Skorobach, N. Yu. (2018). Ironicheskiy i sarkasticheskiy podtekst kak sredstvo formirovaniya modalnosti somneniya v angloyazychnom publitsisticheskom diskurse [Ironic and sarcastic subtext as a means of forming doubt modality in an English language public discourse]. Volzhskij pedagogicheskij vestnik [Volga pedagogical bulletin] 2, pp. 81-91. (in Russ.).
Teplyashina, A. N. (2016). Esteticheskie kategorii ironii I sarkazma v sisteme avtorskih strategiy mediakritika [Aesthetic categories of irony and sarcasm in the author’s system of strategies in media criticism]. Vek informacii [Information Age], 3. Saint Petersburg: School of journalism and mass communications of Saint Petersburg State University, pp. 20–29. (in Russ.).
Shilikhina, K. M. (2008). Intertekst kak sredstvo sozdaniya ironii [Intertext as a means of creating irony]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikaciya. [Bulletin of Voronezh State University. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication] 3, pp. 152–157. (in Russ.).
Aristotle (1924). De Rhetorica ad Alexandrum. Translated by Forster, E. Oxford, available at: https://archive.org/details/worksofaristotle11arisuoft/page/n263/mode/2up (accessed 10.02.2021).
Colston, H. (2017). Irony and Sarcasm, in Attardo, S. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor, New York: Routledge, pp. 234-249.
Duskaeva, L. (2018). The Dynamic and Static Speech Organization of Texts in Business Media. Studies About Languages, 32, pp. 65-76.
Duskaeva, L. R. & Konyaeva, Yu. M. (2017). ‘Types of information portraits in a journalistic discourse’, Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 4, pp. 131-143.
Haiman, J. (1998). Talk Is Cheap: Sarcasm, Alienation, and the Evolution of Language. New York: Oxford University Press, 220 p.
McArthur, T. (1992). Sarcasm, in McArthur, T. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to the English Language, available at: https://vdocuments.mx/mc-arthur-tom-the-oxford-companion-to-the-english-language-1992.html (accessed 10.02.2021).
Pishwa, H. (2009). Language and Social Cognition: Expression of the Social Mind. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 476 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Юлия Коняева
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
