Post-truth as a threat to media consumption in the pandemic era

Authors

  • Сергей Венидиктов Могилевский институт Министерства внутренних дел Республики Беларусь, Могилев, Республика Беларусь https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6859-9724

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47475/2070-0695-2022-10202

Keywords:

post-truth , pandemic, communication, simulacrum, infodemia, media

Abstract

The article reveals the content of the philosophical and communicative phenomenon of post-truth, which describes the current state of public discourse, where the boundaries between objective reality and the virtual environment are blurred. It is shown that the main issue in the study of the information foundations of post-truth is the interaction of the media narrative with the mass audience’s subjective beliefs. The classification of post-truth markers in the digital media space is given. The relationship between the concepts of «post-truth», «infodemic» and «simulacrum», due to the communicative specifics of the pandemic era, has been established. It is shown that media resources, using the tools of post-truth, creating a distorted picture of the world in the post-pandemic era and replicating it, form and strengthen the predisposition of the mass audience to external manipulation. The author comes to the conclusion that communication in the post-pandemic era appears to be a complex phenomenon of virtualized information exchange of distant social structures, in which post-truth is not only a manipulation tool, but also an object of individual consumption.

Author Biography

Сергей Венидиктов, Могилевский институт Министерства внутренних дел Республики Беларусь, Могилев, Республика Беларусь

кандидат филологических наук, соискатель ученой степени доктора политических наук, доцент, начальник кафедры социально-гуманитарных дисциплин

References

Beloedova, A. V. (2018). Kategoriya dostovernosti v sovremennyh zhurnalistskih tekstah (teoreticheskij i prakticheskij aspekty): avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk [Category of reliability in modern journalistic texts (theoretical and practical aspects): abstract of the thesis ... candidate of philological sciences]. Voronezh, 22 p. (in Russ.).

Bodrijyar, Zh. (2017). Duh terrorizma. Vojny v Zalive ne bylo : sbornik [The spirit of terrorism. There was no Gulf War: a compilation]. Moskva, Ripol-Klassik, 226 p. (in Russ.).

Bodrijyar, Zh. (2015). Simulyakry i simulyaciya [Simulacra and simulation]. Moskva, Izd. dom «POSTUM», 240 p. (in Russ.).

Venidiktov, S. V. (2022). Svyazi s obshchestvennost'yu v deyatel’nosti organov vnutrennih del : uchebnoe posobie [Public relations in the activities of the internal affairs bodies : a textbook]. Mogilev, Mogilev. in-t MVD, 148 p. (in Russ.).

Garbuznyak, A. Yu. (2019). Fenomen postpravdy: deval’vaciya fakta v medijnom diskurse [The Post-truth phenomenon: devaluation of fact in media discourse]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie [Knowledge. Understanding. Skill], 1, pp. 184–192. (in Russ.).

Lektorskij, V. A. (2018). Konstruktivnyj realizm kak sovremennaya forma epistemologicheskogo realizma [Constructive realism as a modern form of epistemological realism]. Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki [Philosophy of science and technology], 2 (23), pp. 18–22. (in Russ.).

Lozovskij, B. N. (2011). Manipulyativnye tekhnologii vliyaniya na sredstva massovoj informacii: avtoref. dis. ... dokt. filol. nauk [Manipulative technologies of influence on the mass media: abstract of the thesis. ... doctor of philology]. Ekaterinburg, 40 p. (in Russ.).

Padenie yarkogo meteorita v Podmoskov’e snyali na video [The fall of a bright meteorite in the suburbs was filmed]. Vesti.Ru [Vesti.Ru], available at: https://www.vesti.ru/article/1701537 (accessed: 22.02.2022). (in Russ.).

Sovmestnaya deklaraciya o svobode vyrazheniya mneniya, a takzhe «fejkovyh» novostyah, dezinformacii i propaganda [Joint declaration on freedom of expression and fake news, disinformation and propaganda]. OBSE [OSCE], available at: https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/f/2/302806.pdf (accessed: 22.02.2022). (in Russ.).

Harari, Yu. N. (2019). 21 urok dlya XXI veka [21 Lessons for the 21st Century]. Moskva, Sindbad, 416 p. (in Russ.).

Entin, Dzh. (2000). Teoriya zagovorov i konspirativistskij mentalitet [Conspiracy Theory and the Conspiracy Mentality]. Novaya i novejshaya istoriya [New and recent history], 1, pp. 69–81. (in Russ.).

Yakovenko, A. V. (2018). Postpravda kak pokazatel’ sovremennogo obshchestva i analiticheskij potencial marksizma [Post-truth as an indicator of modern society and the analytical potential of marxism]. Zhurnal sociologii i social’noj antropologii [Journal of sociology and social anthropology], 5 (21), pp. 91–102. (in Russ.).

Davies, W. (2016). The Age of Post-Truth Politics. available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/24/opinion/campaign-stops/the-age-of-post-truth-politics.html (accessed: 22.02.2022).

Keyes, R. (2004). The Post-Truth Era: Dishonesty and Deception in Contemporary Life. New York, St. Martin’s Press. 320 p.

Post-truth politics. Grist Magazine online. available at: https://grist.org/article/2010-03-30-post-truth-politics. (accessed: 14.02.2022).

Word of the Year 2016. Oxford Languages – Oxford University Press. available at: https://languages.oup.com/word-of-the-year/2016. (accessed: 18.02.2022).

Published

2022-05-07

How to Cite

Венидиктов, С. (2022). Post-truth as a threat to media consumption in the pandemic era. Znak: Problemnoe Pole Mediaobrazovanija, (2 (44), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.47475/2070-0695-2022-10202

Issue

Section

Культурология медиа

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.