Creating the objectivity: autopoietic practices of TV reality constructing in professional journalistic milieu

Authors

  • Evgeny Kozhemyakin HSE University, Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Maslenkova Natalya Samara Korolev National Research University, Samara, Russian Federation
  • Pavel Sumskoy Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47475/2070-0695-2024-53-3-33-49

Keywords:

television, construction of TV reality, autopoesis, professional journalistic milieu, objectivity

Abstract

The paper deals with the subjective aspect of the construction of television reality, which is associated with the ideas of constructing process participants about the content and conditions of this activity, as well as their role in this process. The authors explore how professional journalists determine the quality and degree of realism of their author's TV product, and how relevant the problem of realism of a media product is to the community. The authors show what strategic and technological decisions journalists resort to in order to make their product more realistic and / or complying with internal norms and conventions. The paper discusses how the professional status roles of participants in the production of a media product are distributed in terms of their ideas about the contribution of each to the construction of television reality. The

 

study uses a qualitative methodology (unstructured interview). When selecting informants (14 people), the authors took into account the inclusion of respondents in the technological plan of television production activities and professional experience in television. The sample was also based on the geographic variability (large, medium and small cities of Russia) and the level of media (federal, regional, municipal). These criteria were used to identify possible patterns in the autopoietic practices of employees of various media outlets. The authors come to the conclusion that the autopoietic practices of constructing television reality are reflexive, self-evaluative and self-justifying, and the rationalization of journalists' ideas about the constructive nature of activity has certain generation points (their content is determined by a certain context of professional activity and under the influence of subjective and objective factors), as well as it correlates with how actively specialists are included in the technological plan of television production activities.

Author Biographies

Evgeny Kozhemyakin, HSE University, Moscow, Russian Federation

Doctor of Philosophy, professor, professor at the School of Communications, Faculty of Creative Industries

Maslenkova Natalya, Samara Korolev National Research University, Samara, Russian Federation

candidate of philology, Associate Professor, department of sociology and cultural studies

Pavel Sumskoy, Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation

Associate Professor, candidate of cultural studies, Associate Professor of the Basic Department of Television and New Media

References

Beloedova, A. V. (2019). Fejk v prostranstve zhurnalistskogo teksta [Fake in journalistic texts]. Teksty novogo veka. Materialy Mezhregionalnogo kruglogo stola, Orel, 27-28 fevralya 2019 goda. Orel: Oryol State Institute of Culture, 43–46. (In Russ.).

Volkova, I. I. (2015). Igra kak sistemoobrazuyushchiy fenomen ekrannykh kommunikatsiy [Game as a system-constructing phenomenon of screen communications] : author's abstr. dis. … doctor of philological sciences. Moscow. 39 p. (In Russ.).

Gotlib, A. (2004). Kachestvennoe sotsiologicheskoe issledovanie: poznavatel'nye i ekzistentsial'nye gorizonty [Qualitative sociological research: cognitive and existential horizons]. Samara, Russia: Univers-grupp, 448 p. (In Russ.).

D'yakova, E. G. (2005). Konstruirovanie i legitimatsiya sotsial'nykh problem v protsesse ustanovleniya povestki dnya [Constructing and legitimizing of social problems in agenda setting]. Antinomii, 6. 188–211 (In Russ.).

Efanov, A. A. (2019). Moral'nye paniki kak sotsial'nyy protsess [Moral panics as a social process]. Sotsial'nye protsessy v sovremennom rossiyskom obshchestve: problemy i perspektivy. Materialy III Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem uchastiem, Irkutsk, 19.04.2019. Irkutsk: Irkutsk State University, 212–218 (In Russ.).

Zagidullina, M. V. (2022). "Obshchestvo spektaklya" krizisnogo perioda: k voprosu o granitsakh gumanisticheskikh tsennostey ["Society of spectacle" in the crisis period: on the issue of borders of humanistic values]. Mediasreda, 2. 96–106 (In Russ.).

Ivakhnenko, E. N. (2022). Autopoyezis massmediynogo konstruirovaniya budushchego [Autopoesis of mass media constructing of future]. Informatsionnoe obshchestvo, 4, 70–75 (In Russ.).

Il'chenko, S. N. (2023). Pogruzhenie v virtual'nost': tekhnologiya deepfake v praktike otechestvennogo TV [Diving into virtuality: deepfake technologies in public TV practices]. Zhurnalistika v 2022 godu: tvorchestvo, professija, industrija : Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, Moskva, 03–04 fevralja 2023 goda. Moscow: Faculty of Journalism, Federal State Educational Institution of Higher Education "Lomonosov Moscow State University", 155–156 (In Russ.).

Il'chenko, S. N. (2012a). Transformatsiya zhanrovoy struktury sovremennogo otechestvennogo telekontenta: aktualizatsiya igrovoy prirody televideniya [Transformation of genre structure of the modern Russian TV content]. author's abstract. diss. ... Doctor of Philological Sciences. Moscow. 25 p (In Russ.).

Il'chenko, S. N. (2012b). Shou-tsivilizatsiya: real'nost' sovremennoy mediynoy praktiki [Show civilization: the reality of modern media practice]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Yazyk i literatura, 1, 227–230 (In Russ.).

Kachanov, Yu. L. (2000). Nachalo sotsiologii [Beginnings of sociology]. Saint-Petersburg: Aleteya, 256 p. (In Russ.).

Kemarskaya, I. N. (2009). Televizionnyy redactor [Television editor]. Moscow: Aspect-press, 191 p. (In Russ.).

Kvale, S. (2003). Issledovatel'skoe interv'yu [Research interview]. Moscow: Smysl, 301 p. (In Russ.).

Kozhemyakin, E. A. (2011). Ob"ektivnost' kak filosofskaya kategoriya v zhurnalistskom diskurse [Objectivity as a philosophical category in the journalistic discourse]. Nauchnyie vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo univwersiteta. Seria: Gumanitarnyie nauki, 18 (113). 187–194 (In Russ.).

Krasikova, T. R. (2013). Problema konstruirovaniya sotsial'noy real'nosti v teorii massovoy kommunikatsii [The issue of construction of social reality in the theory of mass communications]. Sovremennyy diskurs-analiz, 1. 27–45 (In Russ.).

Lukov, V. A., Lukov M. V. & Lukov A. V. (2008). Televidenie: konstruirovanie kul'tury proiskhodyashchego [Television: constructing the culture of actual]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, 1 – Philosophy. Political Science, URL: http://www.zpu-journal.ru/e-zpu/2008/1/Lukovs_TV/ (In Russ.).

Luhmann, N. (2005). Real'nost' massmedia [Reality of mass media]. Moscow: Praksis. 256 p. (In Russ.).

Maslenkova, N. A. (2021). Dipfeyk: pol'zovatel'skiy kontrol' vizual'nogo kontenta v internete [Deep fake: user’s control for visual content on the Internet]. Polzovatelskiy content v sovremennoy kommunikatsii : sbornik materialov I Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, Chelyabinsk, 22–23 April 2021. Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinsk State University, 186–189. (In Russ.).

Maturana, U. & Varela, F. (2001). Drevo poznaniya: Biologicheskie korni chelovecheskogo ponimaniya [Tree of cognition: biological roots of human understanding]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya, 223 p. (In Russ.).

Novikova, A. A. (2011). Ekrannaya interpretatsiya real'nosti sredstvami televideniya [Screen interpretation of reality by means of TV] : author's abstract. dis. ... doctor of cultural studies. Moscow. 41 p. (In Russ.).

Novikova, A. A. (2013). Televizionnaya real'nost': ekrannaya interpretatsiya deystvitel'nosti [Television reality: screen interpretation of reality]. Moscow: National Research University Higher School of Economics, 240 p. (In Russ.).

Rogozina, I. N. (2020). Feyk n'yus diskurs kak otrazhenie individual'nogo soznaniya politicheskogo deyatelya [Fake news discourse as a reflection of individual mind of a political actor]. Sovremennoe gumanitarnoe nauchnoe znanie: mul'tidisciplinarnyj podhod – 2020 : materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, Barnaul, 11 nojabrja 2020 goda. Barnaul: Altai State Technical University named after I. I. Polzunov, 5–11. (In Russ.).

Schoenfeld, A., Clay, M. & Griffin, R. (2000). Konstruirovanie sotsial'noy problemy: pressa i invayromentalizm [Constructing a social problem: media and environmentalism]. Sredstva massovoy kommunikatsii i sotsial'nye problemy. Kazan: Kazan State University, 139–184 (In Russ.).

Sumskaya, A. S.& Sumskoy, P. F. (2018). Modelirovanie telenovostey v kontekste informatsionnoy politiki telekanala [Modeling of TV News in the Context of Information Policy of a Television Channel]. Voprosy teorii i praktiki zhurnalistiki, 7 (4), 581–598 (In Russ).

Sychev, A. V. & Dmitriev, A. A. (2014). Moral'naya panika kak forma sushchestvovaniya skandala v sovremennom mire [Moral panic as a form of scandal in the modern world]. Skandal: sotsiofilosofskie ocherki. Moscow: TsSPiM, 185–204. (In Russ.).

Altheide, D. (1979). Creating Reality: How TV News Distorts Events. SAGE Library of Social Research.

Allen, Robert C. (Ed.). (2005). Channels of Discourse, Reassembled. Television and Contemporary Criticism. Second edition. N.Y.: Routledge.

Fiske, J. & Hartley, J. (2004). Reading television. N.Y.: Routledge.

Fuller, S. (2018). Post-Truth: Knowledge as A Power Game. Anthem Press.

Gerbner, G. & Gross, L. (1976). Living with Television: The Violence Profile. Journal of Communication, 26, 173–199.

Glasser, I. (1988). Television and the construction of reality. A Review in General Semantics, 45 (2), 156–162.

Hawkins, R. P. & Pingree, S. (1981). Using television to construct social reality. Journal of Broadcasting, 25 (4), 347–364.

Hilgartner, S. & Bosk, C.L. (1988). The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American journal of Sociology, 94 (1), 53–78.

Luhmann, N. (1990). The Autopoiesis of social systems. Essays on self-reference. New York: Columbia University Press, 1–20.

Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. London, Routledge.

Stevens, M. (2013). Autopoiesis in multimedia news messages: A discussion. Multimodal Communication, 2 (1), 55–83.

Tandoc, E. C., Lim, D., & Ling, R. (2020). Diffusion of disinformation: How social media users respond to fake news and why. Journalism, 21 (3), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919868325.

Udoudom, U., Bassey, B., George, K., & Etifit, S. (2024). Impact of Symbolic Interactionism, Pragmatism and Social Constructionism on Communication and Media Practice. International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences, 2 (1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.58578/ijhess.v2i1.2547.

Published

2024-11-12

How to Cite

Kozhemyakin, E., Natalya, M., & Sumskoy, P. (2024). Creating the objectivity: autopoietic practices of TV reality constructing in professional journalistic milieu. Znak: Problemnoe Pole Mediaobrazovanija, (3 (53), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.47475/2070-0695-2024-53-3-33-49

Issue

Section

Теория журналистики и вопросы методов медиаисследований

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.