Interdisciplinarity with the humanities: problems of organizing research team
Keywords:
interdisciplinarity, science history, supervising of research teamsAbstract
The article discusses the main aspects of the actual state of the study of interdisciplinarity as a scientific phenomenon in relation to the practical tasks of organizing interdisciplinary teams. Analyzing the speeches of the participants of the round table “Perspective directions of interdisciplinary research with the humanities”, held in November 2022 as part of the Days of Science in the Chelyabinsk region, and also solving the problem of the effective research team-building for the project 23-18-20098 supported by Russian Science Foundation and Chelyabinsk region, the author identifies three main problem in the organization of interdisciplinary teams: 1) insufficient knowledge of the phenomenon of interdisciplinarity as a certain organization paradigm scientific research; 2) “rhetorization” of the concept of “interdisciplinarity” as a general figure of speech that does not have subject and does not have its own algorithms; 3) problems of organizing interdisciplinary teams as teams of specialists who are mutually interested in multidimensional results. Considering these blocks of problems, the author comes to the conclusion that it is necessary to develop an algorithm for building an interdisciplinary team of scientists aimed at obtaining breakthrough results.
Acknowledgments: Supported by RSF and Chelyabinsk region, No 23-18-20098, https://rscf.ru/en/project/23-18-20098/.
References
Bakanov, S. A. (2022). Byudzhetnoye neravenstvo v SSSR v 1950–1980-ye gg. [Budget inequality in the USSR in the 1950s–1980s]. Ural’skiy istoricheskiy vestnik, 3 (76), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.30759/1728-9718-2022-3(76)-153-160 (in Russ.).
Bakanov, S. A., Medvedev, I. A. & Pivovarov, N. Yu. (2022). Formy i praktiki mezhbyudzhetnykh otnosheniy v SSSR v 1950- ye – pervoy polovine 1960-kh godov [Forms and practices of interbudgetary relations in the USSR in the 1950s – the first half of the 1960s]. Nauchnyy dialog, 11 (3), 355–375. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-3-355-375. (in Russ.).
Bushkovskaya, Ye. A. (2010). Fenomen mezhdistsiplinarnosti v zarubezhnykh issledovaniyakh [The phenomenon of interdisciplinarity in foreign studies]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 330, 152–155. (in Russ.).
Gizhevskiy B. A., Mel’nikov N. N., Zapariy V. V., Zapariy V. V. (2020). Bronevaya stal’ samokhodok Uralmasha. Chernyye metally, 1, 63–68. (in Russ.).
Yepimakhov, A. V., Ankushev, M. N., Ankusheva, P. S., Batanina, N. S., Kiseleva, D. V., Koryakova, L. N., Kupriyanova, Ye. V., Chechushkov, I. V. (2022). Sootnosheniye izotopov strontsiya v biologicheskikh ostatkakh: diagnostirovaniye klyuchevykh faktorov (na materialakh pamyatnikov bronzovogo veka Yuzhnogo Zaural’ya) [Strontium isotope ratio in biological remains: diagnosing key factors (on the materials of the Bronze Age sites of the Southern Trans-Urals)]. Geoarkheologiya i arkheologicheskaya mineralogiya, 9, 19–23. (in Russ.).
Kasavin, I. T. (2004). Filosofiya poznaniya i ideya mezhdistsiplinarnosti [Philosophy of knowledge and the idea of interdisciplinarity]. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki, 2 (2), 5–14. (in Russ.).
Kushneruk, S. L. (2019). Kognitivno-diskursivnoye miromodelirovaniye : opyt sopostavitel’nogo issledovaniya reklamnoy kommunikatsii [Cognitive-discursive world modeling: experience of comparative research of advertising communication]. Moscow, 368 p. (in Russ.).
Kushneruk, S. L. (2022). Strategicheskoye freymirovaniye kak ob”yekt zarubezhnoy kommunikativistiki: istoki, problemy, perspektivy [Strategic framing as an object of foreign communication studies: origins, problems, prospects]. Kommunikativnyye issledovaniya, 9 (2), 243–259. (in Russ.).
Kushneruk, S. L. (2011). Teoriya tekstovykh mirov kak issledovatel’skaya programma v ramkakh kognitivnoy lingvistiki [Theory of text worlds as a research program within the framework of cognitive linguistics]. Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki, 1 (26), 45–51. (in Russ.).
Lysak, I. V. (2016). Mezhdistsiplinarnost’: preimushchestva i problemy primeneniya [Interdisciplinarity: advantages and problems of application]. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, 5, https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=25376 (accessed: 08.04.2023). (in Russ.).
Mayorov, A. V., Goncharov, D. Yu. (2022). Metodologicheskiy instrumentariy ugolovno-pravovykh issledovaniy [Methodological tools of criminal law research]. Pravoporyadok: istoriya, teoriya, praktika, 4 (35), 95–101. (in Russ.).
Matveeva, T. M., Aznacheeva Ye. N. (2023). Pertseptivnyye kategorii: gumanitarnoye i yestestvenno-nauchnoye osmysleniye [Perceptual categories: humanitarian and natural science comprehension]. Kognitivnyye issledovaniya yazyka, 1 (52), 281–287. (in Russ.).
Mel’nikov, N. N., Gizhevskiy B. A., Zapariy V. V., Zapariy V. V. (2019). Istoriya sozdaniya protivosnaryadnoy tankovoy broni 8s [The history of the creation of anti-shell tank armor 8s]. Chernyye metally, 5, 70–77. (in Russ.).
Nevelev, A. B., Kamaletdinova A. Ya. (2022). Energiynost’ kak element logicheskoy struktury ponyatiya [Energy as an element of the logical structure of the concept]. Mirovozzrencheskiye osnovaniya kul’tury sovremennoy Rossii. Magnitogorskiy gosudarstvennyy tekhnicheskiy universitet im. G. I. Nosov Publ., Magnitogorsk, 102–108. (in Russ.).
Nekhamkin, V. A. (2019). Mezhdistsiplinarnost’ v sovremennom gumanitarnom poznanii: tendentsii, itogi i perspektivy razvitiya [Interdisciplinarity in modern humanitarian knowledge: trends, results and development prospects]. Sotsium i vlast’, 2 (76), 96–105. (in Russ.).
Poberezhnikov, I. V. (2002). Modernizatsiya: teoretiko-metodologicheskiye podkhody [Modernization: theoretical and methodological approaches]. Ekonomicheskaya istoriya. Obozreniye, 8, 146–168. (in Russ.).
Porus, V. N. (2013). Mezhdistsiplinarnost’ kak tema filosofii nauki [Interdisciplinarity as a theme of the philosophy of science]. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki, 38 (4), 5–13. (in Russ.).
Selyutin, A. A. (2022). Tsennostnyy pokhod k analizu lingvokul’turnogo obraza «grazhdanin Rossii» [Value approach to the analysis of the linguocultural image “citizen of Russia”]. Sud’by natsional’nykh kul’tur v usloviyakh globalizatsii: mezhdu traditsiyey i novoy real’nost’yu, Chelyabinskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet Publ., Chelyabinsk,158–161. https://doi.org/10.47475/9785727118559-33. (in Russ.).
Sotnikova Ye. S. (2021). Lingvokreativnyy kontent universitetskogo mediadiskursa i ispol’zovaniye sotsial’nykh setey v prepodavanii inostrannykh yazykov [Linguistic and creative content of university media discourse and the use of social networks in teaching foreign languages]. Aktual’nyye problemy izucheniya i prepodavaniya filologicheskikh distsiplin v shkole i vuze, Mir nauki Publ., Moscow, 67–71. (in Russ.).
Dijk, Teun A. van. (1995). Interdisciplinarity. Discourse & Society, 6 (4), 459–460.
Zhang, W., Shi, S., Huang, X., Zhang, S., Yao, P., & Qiu, Y. (2022). The distinctiveness of author interdisciplinarity: A long-neglected issue in research on interdisciplinarity. Journal of Information Science, 48 (1), 90–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551520939499.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Marina Zagidullina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
