National models of journalism in the conditions of globalization processes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47475/2070-0695-2023-48-2-34-40Keywords:
journalism, national model, media system, mass media, globalization, dewesternization, indigenization, Belarusian press, 1990sAbstract
The article presents an analytical review of studies devoted to the study of national models of journalism, the conceptualization of the national experience of journalism in the context of globalization. The author of the article notes the impact of globalization processes, new technologies and mass media commercialization on the global media space. At the same time, the emphasis is on an indigenized approach to studying the media, the essence of which is the conceptualization of the national experience of journalism and the analysis of the activities of media systems in a specific historical context. The theoretical material of the study consists of English-language and Russian-language scientific articles and studies devoted to the study of national models of journalism in different countries. To study the specifics of national Belarusian journalism in the context of an indigenized approach, the data obtained during the research project (2012–2014) were used as an empirical base. The material of the study was 17 interviews with editors and journalists, who were in 1991–1996 founders / creators of new Belarusian periodicals and / or initiators of innovative changes in the information space of the Republic of Belarus. An analysis of the opinions of the interviewed journalists makes it possible to identify such conceptual dominants that characterize the Belarusian print journalism of those years as “freedom”, “influence”, “competition”, which to a certain extent reproduce the normative canon of journalism. The material of the article confirms that the post-Soviet period is of particular interest for research in the context of an indigenized approach to studying national media models. It was then that journalism in the post-Soviet space experienced institutional transformations, mastered new topics and tools of work, integrated into its practice the ideas and principles of journalism borrowed from Western practice.
References
Boid-Barrett, O. (2018). Media-imperializm [Media imperialism]. Kharkov, 292 р. (in Russ.).
Vartanova, E. L. (2019). O kontseptual’nykh osnovaniyakh teorii media [On the conceptual foundations of media theory]. Mediaal’manakh, 3, 8–17 (in Russ.).
Zagidullina, M. V. (2015). Teoriya zhurnalistiki: k voprosu ob indigenizatsii otechestvennykh media-issledovanii [Theory of journalism: on the issue of indigenization of domestic media research]. Znak: problemnoe pole mediaobrazovanija, 1 (15), 64–73 (in Russ.).
Zagidullina, M. V. (2021). Rol’ traditsii v zhurnalistskoi kul’ture XXI veka: k voprosu o devesternizatsii i indigenizatsii issledovatel’skogo polya [The role of tradition in the journalistic culture of the 21st century: on the issue of dewesternization and indigenization of the research field]. Zhurnalistika – Medialogiya – Nastavnichestvo : materialy Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., Minsk : BGU, 150–154 (in Russ.).
Rantanen, T. (2004). Global’noe i natsional’noe. Mass-media i kommunikatsiya v postkommunisticheskoi Rossii [Global and national. Mass Media and Communication in Post-Communist Russia]. Moscow: MSU, 160 р. (in Russ.).
Sluka, A. G. (2011). Belaruskaya zhurnalіstyka: padruchnіk [Belarusian journalism: textbook]. Mіnsk : BDU, 447 р. (in Russ.).
Fedotova, N. A. (2012). Belorusskaya zhurnalistika: rekonstruktsiya opyta 1990-kh [Belarusian Journalism: Reconstruction of the Experience of the 1990s]. Teoriya i sotsiologiya SMI. Ezhegodnik – 2013. Moscow: Fakul’tet zhurnalistiki MGU, 167–183. (in Russ.).
Shiller, G. (1980). Manipulyatory soznaniem [Mind Manipulators]. Moscow: Mysl’, 326 р. (in Russ.).
Gunaratne, Sh. (2009). A Globalization-a non-western perspective: The bias of social science/communication oligopoly. Communication Culture & Critique, 2 (1), 60–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-9137.2008.01029. (accessed: 18.03.2023).
Hallin, D. C. (2016). Typology of Media Systems. Oxford Research Encyclopedias, available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.205 (accessed: 13.03.2023).
Jakubowicz, K. (2001). Rude awakening: Social and media change in Central and Eastern Europe. Javnost – The Public, 8 (4), 59–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2001.11008786.
Matos, C. (2012). Globalization and the mass media. Encyclopedia of Globalization. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470670590.wbeog369.
Nederveen, P. J. (2011). Global Rebalancing: Crisis and the East–South Turn // Development and change. Vol. 42. N 1. Pр. 22–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2010.01686.x.
Servaes, J. (2014). Beyond Modernization and the Four Theories of the Press // Internationalizing “International Communication”. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv65sxh2.6.
Voltmer, К. (2008). Comparing media systems in new democracies: East meets South meets West. Central european journal of communication. 1, available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238733427_Comparing_media_systems_in_new_democracies_East_meets_South_meets_West (accessed 19.03.2023).
Waisbord, S. (2015). De-Westernization and cosmopolitan media studies. Internationalizing “International Communication”. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv65sxh2.11.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Natalia Fedotova

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.